Comparison Overview

East IP

VS

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

East IP

3 Lockhart Road, 25th Floor, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

East IP is an IP firm servicing the needs of multinationals and SMEs in Greater China. The firm has over 430 professionals and staff working from seven offices in China, including Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Guangzhou. East IP offers a full range of IP services, including patent and trademark prosecution, investigations into IP use and infringements, IP litigation, support for criminal and administrative enforcement, assistance with IP licensing and technology transactions, copyright registration, customs recordal and whitelisting, domain name registration and recovery, advertising, data protection and privacy. East IP clients include many of the world’s leading global and Chinese enterprises across a wide range of industries. To date, 26 East IP team members have been recognized as leading practitioners by international surveys of IP professionals. East IP is also highly ranked in all leading industry surveys of IP service providers worldwide, including: Chambers & Partners, The Legal 500, IP Stars, IAM Patent 1000 and World Trademark Review 1000.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

505 University Ave, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 2P2
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The mandate of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (the “WSIAT” or “Tribunal”) is to hear and decide appeals from final decisions of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (the “WSIB” or “Board”) and such other matters as are assigned under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. As an Adjudicative Agency within the Ontario administrative justice system, the Tribunal seeks to provide quality adjudication in workplace safety and insurance appeals in accordance with the principles of natural justice on a fair and timely basis. Its legislative interpretations should provide workers, employers, the Board, government and the public with a well-reasoned commentary on legislation in the workplace safety and insurance system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sips---simone-ip-services.jpeg
East IP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-safety-and-insurance-appeals-tribunal.jpeg
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
East IP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for East IP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal in 2025.

Incident History — East IP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

East IP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sips---simone-ip-services.jpeg
East IP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-safety-and-insurance-appeals-tribunal.jpeg
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both East IP company and Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to East IP company.

In the current year, Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company and East IP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company nor East IP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company nor East IP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company nor East IP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither East IP company nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither East IP company nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company employs more people globally than East IP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither East IP nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X