Comparison Overview

Singapore Army

VS

Albanian Armed Forces

Singapore Army

Gombak Drive Singapore, 669645, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

OUR ARMY: READY, DECISIVE, RESPECTED Our Army is the bedrock of our nation's defence. We draw our strength from our Regulars, NSFs and Operationally Ready NSmen. We thrive on the support of our Families, Employers and fellow Singaporeans. Ready in peace, we are capable of a full spectrum of operations. Decisive in war, we will fight and win to defend our country. Respected by all, our Army is a trusted national institution. We forge the fighting spirit of our people to secure our future and protect our way of life.

NAICS: 928
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Albanian Armed Forces

Tirana Tirana, 00355, AL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Albanian Armed Forces (AAF) (Albanian: Forcat e Armatosura të Republikës së Shqipërisë (FARSH)) were formed after the declaration of independence in 1912. Today it consists of: the General Staff, the Albanian Land Force, the Albanian Air Force and the Albanian Naval Force. According to the Albanian Constitution, the Albanian Armed Forces are charged to: Protect the territorial integrity of the country. Always be present in areas incurring menace. Assist the population in case of natural and industrial disasters and warn the dangers of military and non military nature. Protect the constitutional order as it is determined by law. Participate in international operations in composition of multinational forces.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-army.jpeg
Singapore Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Singapore Army
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Albanian Armed Forces
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singapore Army in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albanian Armed Forces in 2025.

Incident History — Singapore Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singapore Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Albanian Armed Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albanian Armed Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-army.jpeg
Singapore Army
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Singapore Army company and Albanian Armed Forces company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Albanian Armed Forces company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Singapore Army company.

In the current year, Albanian Armed Forces company and Singapore Army company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces company nor Singapore Army company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces company nor Singapore Army company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces company nor Singapore Army company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Singapore Army company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Singapore Army company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Singapore Army company and Albanian Armed Forces company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Singapore Army nor Albanian Armed Forces holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H