Comparison Overview

Simont Braun

VS

MV Law

Simont Braun

Avenue Louise 250, 10th floor, Brussels, Brussels, BE, 1050
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Simont Braun is a leading independent Belgian law firm where passionate lawyers with cutting-edge expertise deliver innovative and pragmatic legal solutions. We cover all areas of business law and provide high quality support to professionals, from start-ups to multinationals, in their multidisciplinary projects and complex disputes. Based in Brussels, at the heart of Europe, we seamlessly integrate the European dimension across all our practices and excel in international collaborations. Our multilingual team works in English, French, Dutch, German, and other languages to ensure a comprehensive service to a diverse clientele. Recognised by the most prestigious legal directories, we pride ourselves on strong client relationships built on integrity and trust. At Simont Braun, we foster a caring and inclusive environment that encourages creativity and growth. Our core values of ownership, respect, continuous learning, and entrepreneurship drive us to turn challenges into opportunities. Experience a firm where passion meets expertise, and excellence is the norm.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MV Law

Level 2, Canberra, ACT, 2601, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

MV Law is a dynamic Australian commercial law and advisory firm based in Canberra. Formed in 2005 through the merger between Meyer Clapham and Vandenberg Reid, our firm is recognised for providing quality service to all our clients. We undertake work for clients at a local and national level, as well as internationally Our knowledgeable staff offer expert legal advice, with a particular focus in the areas of property, commercial and financial law. The firm’s success is based on delivering excellence and value, with clients ranging from small and medium enterprises to large scale property developers, construction entities, tertiary, banking and financial services institutions. We work with Commonwealth and Territory government agencies, businesses, and individuals wanting to set up their first business or plan for succession.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simont-braun.jpeg
Simont Braun
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Simont Braun
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MV Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Simont Braun in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MV Law in 2025.

Incident History — Simont Braun (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Simont Braun cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MV Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MV Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simont-braun.jpeg
Simont Braun
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyer-vandenberg-lawyers.jpeg
MV Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MV Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Simont Braun company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MV Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Simont Braun company.

In the current year, MV Law company and Simont Braun company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MV Law company nor Simont Braun company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MV Law company nor Simont Braun company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MV Law company nor Simont Braun company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Simont Braun company nor MV Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MV Law company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Simont Braun company.

Simont Braun company employs more people globally than MV Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Simont Braun nor MV Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X