Comparison Overview

Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing

VS

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.

Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing

1230Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, 10020, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

From the beginning, the two founding entrepreneurs approached the business in a much different manner than their more buttoned- down colleagues along Publishers Row. The history of S&S is marked by numerous significant industry “firsts.” Dick Simon and Max Schuster were aggressive marketers, often spending five to ten times more for advertising and promotion than their competitors: they were the first publisher to offer booksellers the privilege of returning unsold copies for credit; they were the first to apply mass market production and distribution techniques to books, and in 1939, with Robert Fair de Graff, launched the paperback revolution with the founding of Pocket Books, America’s first paperback publisher. In 1945, they published the first “instant book.” And in 2000, Simon & Schuster became the first publisher to offer an original work by a major author exclusively in electronic form with the publication of Stephen King’s eBook Riding the Bullet, a worldwide publishing and media phenomenon.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.

95 Regent Street, Cambridge, England, CB2 1AW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

eLife is a non-profit organisation inspired by research funders and led by scientists. Our mission is to help scientists accelerate discovery by operating a platform for research communication that encourages and recognises the most responsible behaviours in science. eLife publishes important research in all areas of the life and biomedical sciences. The research is selected and evaluated by working scientists and is made freely available to all readers without delay. eLife also invests in innovation through open-source tool development to accelerate research communication and discovery. Our work is guided by the communities we serve. eLife was founded in 2011 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Max Planck Society and the Wellcome Trust​. These organisations continue to provide financial and strategic support, and were joined by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation for 2018.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simon-&-schuster-children's-publishing.jpeg
Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elife-sciences-publications-ltd.jpeg
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/simon-&-schuster-children's-publishing.jpeg
Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elife-sciences-publications-ltd.jpeg
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company and eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company.

In the current year, eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company and Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company nor Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company nor Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company nor Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. company employs more people globally than Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing nor eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.