Comparison Overview

Silverspin

VS

Delaware Park

Silverspin

Imsida, MT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

At Silverspin, we’re reshaping the world of iGaming with cutting-edge technology and a passion for innovation. We’re dedicated to delivering exceptional player experiences that stand out in a crowded market. We thrive on bold ideas, smart tech, and great people. If you’re ready to be part of a tech-first company where your creativity and skills can shine, Silverspin is the place for you!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Delaware Park

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Delaware Park is a multi-faceted gaming facility offering guests live seasonal Thoroughbred racing, year-round simulcasting from around the globe, live table games, a 20-table poker room and 25-table dedicated tournament room, 2,500 exciting slot machines on two spacious levels, one of only three sports parlay betting venues on the East Coast, and White Clay Creek Country Club, featuring a world class 18-hole championship golf course. Delaware Park is located minutes south of Wilmington and the Delaware Memorial Bridge and just north of the Maryland state line on I-95 at exit 4B. For more information on Delaware Park, visit www.delawarepark.com.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverspin.jpeg
Silverspin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Delaware Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Silverspin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Delaware Park
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silverspin in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Delaware Park in 2025.

Incident History — Silverspin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silverspin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Delaware Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delaware Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverspin.jpeg
Silverspin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Delaware Park
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Delaware Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Silverspin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Delaware Park company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Silverspin company.

In the current year, Delaware Park company and Silverspin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Delaware Park company nor Silverspin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Delaware Park company nor Silverspin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Delaware Park company nor Silverspin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Silverspin company nor Delaware Park company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Silverspin company nor Delaware Park company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Silverspin company employs more people globally than Delaware Park company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Silverspin nor Delaware Park holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H