Comparison Overview

Silverado Casino

VS

Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs

Silverado Casino

1380 W. NEWLANDS DRIVE, FERNLEY, NEVADA, 89408, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Silverado Casino has been family owned and operated since 1994. We take pride in providing a high-quality food and entertainment option to the Fernley community for over 25 years. Silverado Casino offers the total experience, whether you are looking for a nice meal or entertainment, Silverado Casino is the place to go. We strive not only to meet customers’ expectations but exceed them.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs

10515 Colonial Downs Pkwy, New Kent, 23124, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Rosie’s Gaming Emporium® features all your favorite games with the largest jackpots in Virginia. We offer separate smoking and non-smoking gaming areas, fast-casual dining, great promotions, live music and thrilling simulcast horse racing. Plus, experience the thrill of live horse racing on our state-of-the-art Secretariat Turf Course at Colonial Downs in New Kent from July 9 - September 13. With eight locations across Virginia, winning has never been closer! Join us in New Kent, Vinton, Richmond, Hampton, Dumfries, Emporia, Collinsville and the all-new Rose Gaming Resort for a chance to hit the jackpot.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 193
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverado-casino.jpeg
Silverado Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosies-colonial-downs.jpeg
Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Silverado Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silverado Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs in 2025.

Incident History — Silverado Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silverado Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silverado-casino.jpeg
Silverado Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rosies-colonial-downs.jpeg
Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Silverado Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Silverado Casino company.

In the current year, Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company and Silverado Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company nor Silverado Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company nor Silverado Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company nor Silverado Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Silverado Casino company nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Silverado Casino company.

Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs company employs more people globally than Silverado Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Silverado Casino nor Rosie’s Gaming and Colonial Downs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H