Comparison Overview

Silicon Mechanics

VS

CORE Support Systems

Silicon Mechanics

22029 23rd DR SE, Bothell, WA, 98021, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Silicon Mechanics is one of the world’s largest private providers of high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, and enterprise storage systems. Since 2001, clients across sectors including aerospace and defense, education/research, financial services, government, and life sciences/healthcare, among others, have relied on us to help them overcome the world’s most complex computing challenges. Silicon Mechanics solutions always come with our “Expert Included” SM.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CORE Support Systems

12 Mauchly, Irvine, CA 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Centrally located in Irvine, CA., CORE provides the highest level of support available. Our state-of-the-art equipment showroom is truly one-of-a-kind. Installed and operational, you have the ability to kick-the-tires on the latest technologies offered. Don’t rely on brochures and spec sheets offering limited information. If you are considering misson critical support equipment, you owe it to yourself to stop by and actually see a “hands on” demonstration of the various systems offered. Failure to keep your systems up and running 99.9999% of the time, or at “Six Nines”, can cost your company a fortune in lost business. Keeping critical systems running at Six-Nines requires an attention to detail and the orchestration of many complex systems. Only CORE Support Systems offers 360 DEGREE Support designed to meet the needs of your entire operation,ensuring you have the systems, resources, and support needed to run 24/7/365.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silicon-mechanics.jpeg
Silicon Mechanics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/core-support-systems.jpeg
CORE Support Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Silicon Mechanics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CORE Support Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silicon Mechanics in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CORE Support Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Silicon Mechanics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silicon Mechanics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CORE Support Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CORE Support Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/silicon-mechanics.jpeg
Silicon Mechanics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/core-support-systems.jpeg
CORE Support Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CORE Support Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Silicon Mechanics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CORE Support Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Silicon Mechanics company.

In the current year, CORE Support Systems company and Silicon Mechanics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CORE Support Systems company nor Silicon Mechanics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CORE Support Systems company nor Silicon Mechanics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CORE Support Systems company nor Silicon Mechanics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Silicon Mechanics company nor CORE Support Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Silicon Mechanics company nor CORE Support Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Silicon Mechanics company employs more people globally than CORE Support Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Silicon Mechanics nor CORE Support Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H