Comparison Overview

Signs.com

VS

Pinecrest Printing & Signs

Signs.com

1550 Gladiola St, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84104, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Well, technically we are a bunch of sign, design and tech nerds who got together to create the best e-commerce sign site in the known universe. We wanted to create a business with one simple goal - provide the absolute best sign buying experience out there. To do that, we had to create a site with a killer design tool, offer superior customer service and produce the highest quality signs using the best materials. We launched Signs.com in 2012 with the backing of Ferrari Color. Who? Well you might not know or care who they are, but Pottery Barn, Starbucks and Lucky Brand sure do. In fact, those are only a few of the companies who use Ferrari Color to produce their signs and graphics. The good news is, because Ferrari Color is our production partner, the same level of quality and detail these awesome companies get is now available to individuals and small businesses through Signs.com. The Signs.com blog brings you daily insight from successful business owners, guest posts from industry experts and tips to help you get the most out of your signage. We also have how-tos related to the installation, maintenance and care of your professionally produced signs. So come visit us at http://www.signs.com and see the difference!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pinecrest Printing & Signs

2822 Broadway Center Blvd, Brandon, Florida, 33510, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinecrest Printing & Signs estabished in 2001 , We have become an industry leader in cultivating customer Relationships that last , We take pride in what we do and working with each client to make sure they are satisfied with the end result . Our Team works well together and that shows in our customer service. Our values are Think like a small family business that produces BIG Corporate results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-com.jpeg
Signs.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinecrest-printing.jpeg
Pinecrest Printing & Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signs.com
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pinecrest Printing & Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signs.com in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinecrest Printing & Signs in 2025.

Incident History — Signs.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signs.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pinecrest Printing & Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinecrest Printing & Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signs-com.jpeg
Signs.com
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinecrest-printing.jpeg
Pinecrest Printing & Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pinecrest Printing & Signs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Signs.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pinecrest Printing & Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signs.com company.

In the current year, Pinecrest Printing & Signs company and Signs.com company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pinecrest Printing & Signs company nor Signs.com company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pinecrest Printing & Signs company nor Signs.com company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pinecrest Printing & Signs company nor Signs.com company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signs.com company nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signs.com company nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signs.com company employs more people globally than Pinecrest Printing & Signs company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signs.com nor Pinecrest Printing & Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N