Comparison Overview

Signquick

VS

Label King

Signquick

1426 Atlantis Drive, Webster, TX, 77598, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Signquick specializes in many types of signs for the Self Storage, Apartment Homes, Property Management, Oil & Gas, Residential and Commercial Real Estate Industries to name a few. We offer award winning in-house graphic design, manufacturing and installation. We are your source for custom signage, fast turnaround and shipping throughout the United States. We invite you to view our products online at www.signquick.com. We also offer pre-designed signs and online design. Need a sample? How about a catalog? We offer free samples and are happy to email you our online catalog or mail it to you. Please message us for details.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Label King

9555 Distribution Ave, San Diego, California, 92121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Label King is a full service tag & label manufacturer dedicated to quality and customer service. The longstanding relationships we’ve fostered with our customers and vendors over the past 22 years is due to our hardworking, experienced team, our “customer first” attitude, an our cutting-edge machinery. Our sole purpose is to make high-quality labels for you and your business! OVER 3.6 BILLION LABELS AND COUNTING!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signquick.jpeg
Signquick
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-king.jpeg
Label King
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signquick
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Label King
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signquick in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Label King in 2025.

Incident History — Signquick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signquick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Label King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Label King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signquick.jpeg
Signquick
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/label-king.jpeg
Label King
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signquick company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Label King company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Label King company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signquick company.

In the current year, Label King company and Signquick company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Label King company nor Signquick company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Label King company nor Signquick company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Label King company nor Signquick company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signquick company nor Label King company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signquick company nor Label King company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Label King company employs more people globally than Signquick company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signquick nor Label King holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N