Comparison Overview

Signbox

VS

Studio 66

Signbox

3 Egham Business Village, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8RB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

For over 35 years, Signbox has remained the first name in aspirational signage solutions that push the boundaries of innovation and challenge convention. We apply a conceptual, holistic approach to signage meticulously across market sectors, including high-end corporate and residential interiors, education, healthcare, retail, hotel and leisure environments, across the globe, inside and out. We’re proud to have worked with some of the world’s most exciting brands who rely on us to deliver iconic award-winning signage solutions that inspire and motivate their people and partners across their international locations. It’s all thanks to a team of the industry’s finest signage specialists, our great British design and engineering brilliance and an intrinsic desire to look at signage differently. Our intelligent architectural signage solutions transform buildings from functional structures into unforgettable landmarks, turn settings into eye-catching scenic masterpieces – and bring spaces to life. We know that great signage can build powerful brands too. From the sublime to the statement, Signbox’s ingenious signage solutions create an instant, impactful perception of the bigger picture and inspire brand loyalty. For those on the inside, we’re enhancing human behaviour and helping people to interact with their environment, to move effortlessly within it and to rely on signage structures and symbols that inform and guide. Our high-end signage applications embrace traditional, eclectic and bespoke signage solutions that that invigorate the built environment, including: • Architectural signs • Environmental graphics • Wayfinding signage • Digitally printed glazing manifestations • Digital wallpapers • Digital signage • LED illumination View our showreel to discover more about our award-winning approach to signage, then talk to us about how we can help you https://vimeo.com/374654026/88c73d544f Signbox signs change everything.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio 66

Baanhoek 184 Sliedrecht, Zuid-Holland 3361GN, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Een kleine, veelzijdige reclamestudio. Dat is Studio 66 in het kort. Actief voor lokale en regionale opdrachtgevers. Maar soms kloppen ook landelijk opererende organisaties aan voor een creatief antwoord op hun reclame- of drukwerkvraag. Grafische vormgeving Denk aan het ontwerp of restylen van uw logo, een brochure of een website. Maar ook met de inkoop en controle van drukwerk en het schrijven van reclameteksten gaat Studio 66 graag voor u aan de slag. En als het niet intern kan worden aangepakt, wordt een expert uit het uitgebreide netwerk ingeschakeld. Freelance Voor freelance-opdrachten trekt Studio 66 haar grafische neus niet op. Integendeel, in de loop van de tijd is er al flink wat werk verzet voor collega-reclamebureau’s. Zowel op locatie als vanuit de studio in Sliedrecht. Ideaal voor een tijdelijk overschot aan werk of voor een frisse kijk op de zaak. Content Management Hoe mooi een website ook is, hij boet al snel aan kracht in als de informatie erop niet relevant of verouderd is. Vaak wordt tijdens de bouw van een website veel geld, tijd en aandacht aan de inhoud geïnvesteerd. Maar na verloop van tijd blijkt dat het toch moeilijker is dan gedacht om de site up-to-date te houden. Ook hierin kan Studio 66 een rol spelen. Heeft u na deze korte introductie nog vragen? Bel of mail dan gerust. Ik leg u graag alles haarfijn uit. Met vriendelijke groet, René Blankenstein

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signbox-ltd.jpeg
Signbox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-66.jpeg
Studio 66
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signbox
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio 66
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signbox in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio 66 in 2025.

Incident History — Signbox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signbox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio 66 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio 66 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signbox-ltd.jpeg
Signbox
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-66.jpeg
Studio 66
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signbox company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio 66 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio 66 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signbox company.

In the current year, Studio 66 company and Signbox company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio 66 company nor Signbox company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio 66 company nor Signbox company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio 66 company nor Signbox company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signbox company nor Studio 66 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signbox company nor Studio 66 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signbox company employs more people globally than Studio 66 company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signbox nor Studio 66 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X