Comparison Overview

Signature Theatre

VS

Theater de Bussel

Signature Theatre

480 W 42nd ST, New York, 10036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Founded in 1991, Signature Theatre celebrates playwrights and gives them an artistic home, producing a body of work by each resident writer and a season of six to eight productions annually. In 2005, Signature began its groundbreaking Signature Ticket Initiative, providing affordable tickets to every production. In 2012, Signature opened the Pershing Square Signature Center, the Frank Gehry-designed 75,000 square foot Center featuring three theatres, two rehearsal studios, a central, public lobby with a café and bookstore, and administrative offices. In 2014, Signature became the first New York City theatre to receive the Regional Theatre Tony Award®.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 101
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Theater de Bussel

Torenstraat 10, Oosterhout, 4901 EJ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-14

Theater de Bussel ligt in het stadscentrum van Oosterhout. Het is een sfeervol theater met professioneel en lokaal theater- en concertaanbod. In 2015 is ons theater volledig gerenoveerd; u kunt er terecht voor zakelijke en feestelijke evenementen, congressen, symposia, exposities, beurzen, theater- en concertvoorstellingen. Het theater heeft de beschikking over een moderne grote zaal met 450 zitplaatsen en een kleine zaal met 200 zitplaatsen. Beide zalen zijn multi-functioneel, dus ook geschikt voor staconcerten en sit down diners.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signature-theatre-company.jpeg
Signature Theatre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theater-de-bussel.jpeg
Theater de Bussel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signature Theatre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Theater de Bussel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signature Theatre in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Theater de Bussel in 2025.

Incident History — Signature Theatre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signature Theatre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Theater de Bussel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Theater de Bussel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signature-theatre-company.jpeg
Signature Theatre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/theater-de-bussel.jpeg
Theater de Bussel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Signature Theatre company and Theater de Bussel company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Theater de Bussel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signature Theatre company.

In the current year, Theater de Bussel company and Signature Theatre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Theater de Bussel company nor Signature Theatre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Theater de Bussel company nor Signature Theatre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Theater de Bussel company nor Signature Theatre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signature Theatre company nor Theater de Bussel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signature Theatre company nor Theater de Bussel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signature Theatre company employs more people globally than Theater de Bussel company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signature Theatre nor Theater de Bussel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N