Comparison Overview

Signature HomeStyles

VS

LocoSoco

Signature HomeStyles

11101 Franklin Ave, Franklin Park, Illinois, 60131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.signaturehomestyles.com

Signature HomeStyle's mission is to provide everyone with turnkey opportunities to succeed in a business of their own. From Decorators to Sidegigsters to Influencers our unique platform puts people in business with their own co-branded website in minutes. We do all the operational heavy lifting so our consultants can focus on engaging with their audience. We helped create the Social Commerce business model, empowering tens of thousands of partners since our inception in 1972. Our inspiring exclusive products can be found in millions of homes. We continue to drive the evolution of Social Commerce and have recently launched a groundbreaking new eCommerce model that provides the best experience for our customers. Of course, Great consultants need Great products. Our designers create unique exclusive lines of Home Decor, Lighting, Candles, Coffee, and much more. Most products are warehoused and shipped from our headquarters in the Chicagoland area.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 224
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LocoSoco

LocoSoco, London & Essex, England, SS9 3EB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 750 and 799
https://locoso.co

Welcome to LocoSoco where the possibilities for sustainability are endless... LocoSoco create, source and distribute products and technologies that contribute to sustainability in a way that creates shared wealth. Everybody surely wants to do something to help our planet, right? LocoSoco provide the tools, technologies and products to support those people, businesses and communities that want to make a difference. #shifthappens

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signature-homestyles.jpeg
Signature HomeStyles
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/locosoco.jpeg
LocoSoco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signature HomeStyles
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LocoSoco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signature HomeStyles in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LocoSoco in 2025.

Incident History — Signature HomeStyles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signature HomeStyles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LocoSoco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LocoSoco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signature-homestyles.jpeg
Signature HomeStyles
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/locosoco.jpeg
LocoSoco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signature HomeStyles company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LocoSoco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LocoSoco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signature HomeStyles company.

In the current year, LocoSoco company and Signature HomeStyles company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LocoSoco company nor Signature HomeStyles company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LocoSoco company nor Signature HomeStyles company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LocoSoco company nor Signature HomeStyles company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signature HomeStyles company nor LocoSoco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signature HomeStyles company nor LocoSoco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signature HomeStyles company employs more people globally than LocoSoco company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signature HomeStyles nor LocoSoco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References