Comparison Overview

Signal Graphics

VS

Litho Superpak

Signal Graphics

5138 S Broadway, Englewood, Colorado, 80113, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.signalgraphics.com/englewoodco051/

Experience Over 30 Years of Excellence with Signal Graphics Printing and Marketing Services! 🚀 Our legacy spans decades, embodying industry expertise, unparalleled customer care, and a 'whatever it takes' approach. Need solutions? Think Signal Graphics. From branding to web design, integrated campaigns to customer acquisition, we've got you covered. Our global network ensures we're always within reach, providing both local support and cutting-edge technology. At Signal Graphics, innovation is in our DNA. We stay ahead of the curve, leveraging state-of-the-art tech and embracing emerging trends to propel your success. Facing a printing or marketing challenge? Lean on us for results that exceed expectations!" Keywords: Printing services, Marketing solutions, Branding, Web design, Integrated campaigns, Customer acquisition, Global network, Innovation, Technology, Cutting-edge, Customer care.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Litho Superpak

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://lithosuperpak.com.au

LITHO SUPERPAK (LSP) is an Australian owned and family run lithographic printing company with over 30 years’ experience in manufacturing packaging for many household names. Now proudly part of the Print Mefia Group, we focus on the manufacture of printed packaging, inner boxes and point of sale tools tailored to the needs of each individual customer across a variety of industries. Our printing and finishing equipment are of the highest quality German and Swiss Manufacture and capable of satisfying client orders ranging anywhere from a few hundred to several million units. Our main activities include structural design, offset printing, die cutting, high speed gluing, warehousing and logistics. We pride ourselves on the quality of product that we produce, and as such, are Certified for ISO 9001:2015 and HACCP food safety and offer FSC and PEFC Chain of Custody Certified products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signal-graphics-51.jpeg
Signal Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-superpak-p-l.jpeg
Litho Superpak
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signal Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Litho Superpak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signal Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Litho Superpak in 2025.

Incident History — Signal Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signal Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Litho Superpak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Litho Superpak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signal-graphics-51.jpeg
Signal Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litho-superpak-p-l.jpeg
Litho Superpak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signal Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Litho Superpak company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Litho Superpak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signal Graphics company.

In the current year, Litho Superpak company and Signal Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Signal Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Signal Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Litho Superpak company nor Signal Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signal Graphics company nor Litho Superpak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signal Graphics company nor Litho Superpak company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signal Graphics company employs more people globally than Litho Superpak company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signal Graphics nor Litho Superpak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References