Comparison Overview

Sign Production

VS

Ballarat Mailworks

Sign Production

Mallslingan 8B, Täby, 18766, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Sign Production är moden och nytänkande aktör inom exponeringsreklam med fokus på design och kvalité. Stockholm Sign Production AB grundades Januari 2010 genom en sammanslagning av två mindre aktörer inom reklambranchen. Genom dessa två aktörers kundstock samt erfarenhet var Stockholm Sign Production AB starkt redan i startskedet. Aktiv utveckling av metoder och produkter gör Stockholm Sign Production AB till ett ledande företag inom dessa områden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ballarat Mailworks

521 Dowling Street, Wendouree, 3355, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Ballarat Mailworks is your complete mailing and distribution solution for metropolitan and regional Victoria. We can fulfill all of your mailing needs. From bulk mailouts, catalogue distribution, database management, printing, envelope supply, folding and inserting. We handle all forms of letters, monthly accounts, promotional brochures or magazines - we can assist you and your business getting the message out to your customers, members, subscribers or the general public. At Ballarat Mailworks, we get the mail done.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sign-production.jpeg
Sign Production
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ballarat-mailworks.jpeg
Ballarat Mailworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sign Production
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ballarat Mailworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sign Production in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ballarat Mailworks in 2025.

Incident History — Sign Production (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sign Production cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ballarat Mailworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ballarat Mailworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sign-production.jpeg
Sign Production
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ballarat-mailworks.jpeg
Ballarat Mailworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sign Production company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ballarat Mailworks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ballarat Mailworks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sign Production company.

In the current year, Ballarat Mailworks company and Sign Production company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ballarat Mailworks company nor Sign Production company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ballarat Mailworks company nor Sign Production company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ballarat Mailworks company nor Sign Production company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sign Production company nor Ballarat Mailworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sign Production company nor Ballarat Mailworks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sign Production company employs more people globally than Ballarat Mailworks company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sign Production nor Ballarat Mailworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L