Comparison Overview

Sigma Enterprise

VS

Micas Networks

Sigma Enterprise

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Sigma Power Services is a professional manufacturer in the field of UPS for over 15 years. We have large production sites and have been a leading UPS industry in Pakistan. Since established, The Company has carried out three strategies: operation innovation strategy, people-oriented strategy, technical guidance strategy, and implemented strict scientific management with full-fledged quality management system. All the introduction of products is just for reference, please subject to real things. The company invests 5% of its annual revenue in researching and development every year. We had international advanced equipments for developing testing and producing. We have co-operative partner throughout the country, We offer wide range quality products either from our own standard range or customer made to your specifications. SIGMA Power Services is becoming the most growthful UPS supplier all over the country.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Micas Networks

250 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Micas Networks is a startup open networking data center switching company, driving accelerated data delivery to support the datacenter infrastructure landscape. With a customer-centric approach and strategic partnerships, we offer high-performance, energy-efficient solutions, tailored to meet data center requirements. We have a full portfolio of open networking products and support various operating systems. Our exceptional engineering capabilities, robust supply chain, and cost-effective manufacturing base empower us to help accelerate data delivery. We are based in San Jose, CA. Learn more at micasnetworks.com

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-enterprise.jpeg
Sigma Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/micas-networks.jpeg
Micas Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sigma Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Micas Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigma Enterprise in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Micas Networks in 2025.

Incident History — Sigma Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigma Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Micas Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Micas Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-enterprise.jpeg
Sigma Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/micas-networks.jpeg
Micas Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sigma Enterprise company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Micas Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Micas Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sigma Enterprise company.

In the current year, Micas Networks company and Sigma Enterprise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Micas Networks company nor Sigma Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Micas Networks company nor Sigma Enterprise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Micas Networks company nor Sigma Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sigma Enterprise company nor Micas Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sigma Enterprise company nor Micas Networks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Micas Networks company employs more people globally than Sigma Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sigma Enterprise nor Micas Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.