Comparison Overview

Sigal Music Museum

VS

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

Sigal Music Museum

516 Buncombe St, None, Greenville, South Carolina, US, 29601
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://sigalmusicmuseum.org/

Sigal Music Museum features one of the largest collections of historically significant instruments in the United States. Resonating with sights, sounds, opportunities, and discovery, Sigal Music Museum provides a total musical immersion experience designed to delight and inspire music lovers of all ages. Our visitors include music aficionados, students, musicians, scholars, and tourists from across the country and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art

386 BEACH BLVD, BILOXI, 39530, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.georgeohr.org

The mission of the Ohr-O’Keefe Museum of Art is to promote and preserve the unique legacy of Biloxi potter George E. Ohr and the diverse cultural heritage of the Mississippi Gulf Coast; and to exhibit works which exemplify the independent, innovative, and creative spirit of George Ohr, emancipated craftsman Pleasant Reed, and Ohr-O’Keefe Museum architect Frank Gehry. This mission is served through compelling exhibitions and educational experiences viewed from a fresh perspective relevant to our community, the region, and the nation with a strong focus on ceramic arts.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sigal Music Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigal Music Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Sigal Music Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigal Music Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohr-o'keefe-museum-of-art.jpeg
Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sigal Music Museum company and Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sigal Music Museum company.

In the current year, Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company and Sigal Music Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art company employs more people globally than Sigal Music Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ohr-O'Keefe Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References