Comparison Overview

Sigal Music Museum

VS

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

Sigal Music Museum

516 Buncombe St, None, Greenville, South Carolina, US, 29601
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Sigal Music Museum features one of the largest collections of historically significant instruments in the United States. Resonating with sights, sounds, opportunities, and discovery, Sigal Music Museum provides a total musical immersion experience designed to delight and inspire music lovers of all ages. Our visitors include music aficionados, students, musicians, scholars, and tourists from across the country and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art

176 Water Company Road, Millersburg, PA, 17061, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

"Seeing is more than merely looking, it involves noticing things" - Ned Smith The mission of the Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art is to honor the legacy of Ned Smith by merging the arts and natural world through education, exhibition, and experiences. Rooted in the scenic Susquehanna Valley of Central Pennsylvania, we strive to be the leading institution for the collection and dissemination of art and natural history knowledge, particularly when the two intersect and reinforce one another. We are the repository for the art, writings and other work of the late Ned Smith, from whose life the center takes its original inspiration. The center seeks to appeal to all ages, races and genders across Pennsylvania and beyond. Our goal is to be viewed as a vibrant cornerstone to the cultural, economic, social and environmental life of communities near and far.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sigal Music Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigal Music Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art in 2026.

Incident History — Sigal Music Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigal Music Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigal-music-museum.jpeg
Sigal Music Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ned-smith-center-for-nature-and-art.jpeg
Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sigal Music Museum company and Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sigal Music Museum company.

In the current year, Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company and Sigal Music Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company nor Sigal Music Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sigal Music Museum company nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art company employs more people globally than Sigal Music Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sigal Music Museum nor Ned Smith Center for Nature and Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H