Comparison Overview

Siferd & McCluskey, LPA

VS

APJ Solicitors

Siferd & McCluskey, LPA

212 N. Elizabeth St., Lima, Ohio, 45801, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Siferd & McCluskey, LPA has been representing claimaints in Lima, and surrounding areas for more than 90 years. The lawyers in our firm live and have raised their families in Allen County, which gives us a unique perspective and pulse on the community. Our firm has an active trial and appellate practice in Allen County which helps us with personal injury cases (and other areas of the law) within Allen and the surrounding counties. We have handled cases in most of the Ohio counties and in United States District Courts. Our focus for the past 30 years has been the representation of injured individuals. Our staff has been with us for years and you will find them very helpful, courteous and highly skilled as we fight for your rights.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

APJ Solicitors

APJ Solicitors, Warrington, Daresbury, WA1 1RW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

APJ Solicitors is a team of experts dedicated to investigating, negotiating and settling a broad range of claims against a wide variety of financial services providers. Our specialist solicitors only undertake this type of work which means they are solely focussed on this area of law and are completely familiar with all the issues that surround the mis-selling of financial products. Our team have over 40 years’ experience in challenging banks, advisors, lenders and investment providers regarding their negligent advice and services. Our technical expertise underpins our drive and determination to fight hard for your rights and acquire financial redress. We are client-orientated with a forward-thinking approach to providing expert legal advice to ensure that we support you efficiently and effectively, ensuring your journey is seamless from beginning to end.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siferd-&-mccluskey-lpa.jpeg
Siferd & McCluskey, LPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Siferd & McCluskey, LPA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
APJ Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siferd & McCluskey, LPA in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APJ Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Siferd & McCluskey, LPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siferd & McCluskey, LPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — APJ Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APJ Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siferd-&-mccluskey-lpa.jpeg
Siferd & McCluskey, LPA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to APJ Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, APJ Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company.

In the current year, APJ Solicitors company and Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company nor APJ Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company nor APJ Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

APJ Solicitors company employs more people globally than Siferd & McCluskey, LPA company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Siferd & McCluskey, LPA nor APJ Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X