Comparison Overview

Sierra College

VS

University of Tehran

Sierra College

5100 Sierra College Blvd. , Rocklin, ca, US, 95677-3397
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sierracollege.edu/

Since its founding in 1936, Sierra College has focused on quality instruction and meeting the needs of the communities that it serves. With approximately 125 degree and certificate programs, Sierra College is ranked first in Northern California for transfers to 4 year Universities. It offers career and technical education (CTE) as well as classes for upgrading job skills, and Sierra graduates may be found in businesses and industries throughout the region. The college is nationally recognized for excellence in its athletic programs; and its award-winning faculty members enhance their teaching with research, authorship and industry expertise.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 1,444
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

University of Tehran

16 Azar Street, Enghlab Avenue, Tehran, Tehran, IR, 1417466191
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ut.ac.ir/

University of Tehran, an iconic institution of higher education in Iran, traces its origins back seven centuries to its foundation as a houza (traditional religious school). Over time, it evolved from this religious structure into a modern academic institution. About a century ago, the Dar-ol-Fonoon College became the first engineering school in its modern form, marking a significant step in Iran's higher education landscape. The University of Tehran, as it is known today, was officially inaugurated in the winter of 1934. Currently, the University of Tehran offers 976 programs across 500 fields within 39 faculties and 120 departments located on campuses in Tehran, Qom, Karaj, Kish, and Jolfa. The university is supported by a distinguished faculty of over 2,000 tenured members. Approximately 15% of Iran’s Centers of Excellence, as recognized by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, are affiliated with the University of Tehran. UT’s dedication to research is reflected in its more than 40 research centers, 3,500 laboratories, and its leading press, which publishes over 50 peer-reviewed scientific journals. For more details on the University of Tehran’s colleges and faculties, please visit: https://ut.ac.ir/en/page/9786/colleges-faculties-international-campuses

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,941
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-college.jpeg
Sierra College
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-tehran.jpeg
University of Tehran
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sierra College
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Tehran
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sierra College in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Tehran in 2025.

Incident History — Sierra College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sierra College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Tehran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Tehran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-college.jpeg
Sierra College
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-tehran.jpeg
University of Tehran
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Tehran company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sierra College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sierra College company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Tehran company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Tehran company and Sierra College company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Sierra College company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Tehran company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Tehran company nor Sierra College company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Tehran company nor Sierra College company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sierra College company nor University of Tehran company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Tehran company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sierra College company.

University of Tehran company employs more people globally than Sierra College company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sierra College nor University of Tehran holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References