Comparison Overview

Sierra College

VS

Louisiana State University

Sierra College

5100 Sierra College Blvd. , Rocklin, ca, US, 95677-3397
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Since its founding in 1936, Sierra College has focused on quality instruction and meeting the needs of the communities that it serves. With approximately 125 degree and certificate programs, Sierra College is ranked first in Northern California for transfers to 4 year Universities. It offers career and technical education (CTE) as well as classes for upgrading job skills, and Sierra graduates may be found in businesses and industries throughout the region. The college is nationally recognized for excellence in its athletic programs; and its award-winning faculty members enhance their teaching with research, authorship and industry expertise.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 1,444
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Louisiana State University

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, la, 70803, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LSU is the flagship institution of Louisiana and is one of only 30 universities nationwide holding land-grant, sea-grant and space-grant status. Since 1860, LSU has served its region, the nation, and the world through extensive, multipurpose programs encompassing instruction, research, and public service. The university brings in more than $150 million annually in outside research grants and contracts, a significant factor for the Louisiana economy.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,244
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-college.jpeg
Sierra College
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sierra College
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Louisiana State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sierra College in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louisiana State University in 2025.

Incident History — Sierra College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sierra College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Louisiana State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louisiana State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-college.jpeg
Sierra College
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Louisiana State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sierra College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sierra College company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Louisiana State University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Louisiana State University company and Sierra College company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Sierra College company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Louisiana State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University company nor Sierra College company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University company nor Sierra College company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sierra College company nor Louisiana State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Louisiana State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sierra College company.

Louisiana State University company employs more people globally than Sierra College company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sierra College nor Louisiana State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N