Comparison Overview

Siemens Gamesa

VS

LDK Solar

Siemens Gamesa

Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, edificio 222, Zamudio, Vizcaya, 48170, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Siemens Gamesa is a global technology leader in the renewable energy industry - specifically in the development, manufacturing, installation and maintenance of wind turbines. Being a pioneer in renewables since the 1980s, we put our scale and entrepreneurial culture to work on driving the energy transition towards a sustainable world. We empower our customers, people, and partners to lead the future with green energy. Siemens Gamesa is a trademark licensed by Siemens AG.

NAICS: 33441
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 21,722
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LDK Solar

LDK Avenue Economic Development Zone Xinyu City, Jiangxi Province 338032, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

LDK Solar is one of the world’s leading vertically-integrated producers of mono and polycrystalline solar PV products, covering the entire manufacturing process including silicon, ingots, wafers, cells, and modules. Founded in 2005 in Xinyu, China, LDK Solar has been listed on the NYSE since 2007 under the ticker symbol LDK. The company employs approximately 25,000 people and maintains sales, marketing, and customer service offices throughout the world. LDK Solar’s depth and strength in photovoltaics is the result of its ownership of each stage of the manufacturing process. This control enables continuous innovation to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and sustain high quality year over year. The company maintains its own polysilicon plants, including the largest in Asia, with 25,000 MT current capacity, expanding to 55,000 MT capacity by the end of 2013. With 4.2 GW of wafer capacity, the company is one of the top producers of solar wafers worldwide. Many modules from other leading manufacturers worldwide use LDK’s wafers. LDK Solar has 3.2 GW of module manufacturing capacity, producing a full line of mono and polycrystalline modules for residential, commercial, utility, and off-grid markets. With low-cost vertically-integrated manufacturing, more patents than any other Chinese company in solar, and a strong diversified customer base, LDK Solar is one of the leaders in the march to grid parity for solar PV.

NAICS: 33441
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemensgamesa.jpeg
Siemens Gamesa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ldk-solar.jpeg
LDK Solar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Siemens Gamesa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LDK Solar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens Gamesa in 2025.

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LDK Solar in 2025.

Incident History — Siemens Gamesa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens Gamesa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LDK Solar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LDK Solar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemensgamesa.jpeg
Siemens Gamesa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ldk-solar.jpeg
LDK Solar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Siemens Gamesa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LDK Solar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LDK Solar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Siemens Gamesa company.

In the current year, LDK Solar company and Siemens Gamesa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LDK Solar company nor Siemens Gamesa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LDK Solar company nor Siemens Gamesa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LDK Solar company nor Siemens Gamesa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Siemens Gamesa company nor LDK Solar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Siemens Gamesa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LDK Solar company.

Siemens Gamesa company employs more people globally than LDK Solar company, reflecting its scale as a Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Siemens Gamesa nor LDK Solar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H