Comparison Overview

Sielaff Corporation

VS

Voyager Interiors

Sielaff Corporation

1011 Dodge St, Mineral Point, Wisconsin, 53565-1164, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At Sielaff Corporation, we work with customers to create beautiful steel furniture and furniture components. We take immeasurable pride in our design, engineering and manufacturing, and for over 30 years, our Wisconsin-based factory has produced exclusive contemporary furniture designs for customers throughout North America. We see each project as a chance to showcase our unmatched attention to detail, superior design, and uncompromising quality, and when customers demand complete metalworking solutions, we deliver.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Voyager Interiors

477 Church St, Richmond, Victoria, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Voyager Interiors was founded by an experienced team of furniture retailers and interior specialists, with 40 years of continuous business experience in Victoria. Focusing on an eclectic blend of quality Australia, Italian and International furniture and homewares, Voyager Interiors caters for the private consumer, design professionals, and commercial/contract buyers. Offering a world class showroom coupled with knowledgeable and friendly advice, the Voyager team aim to provide furniture industry excellence for both quality and value for money.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sielaff-corp.jpeg
Sielaff Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voyager-interiors.jpeg
Voyager Interiors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sielaff Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Voyager Interiors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sielaff Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voyager Interiors in 2025.

Incident History — Sielaff Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sielaff Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Voyager Interiors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voyager Interiors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sielaff-corp.jpeg
Sielaff Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voyager-interiors.jpeg
Voyager Interiors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sielaff Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Voyager Interiors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Voyager Interiors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sielaff Corporation company.

In the current year, Voyager Interiors company and Sielaff Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Voyager Interiors company nor Sielaff Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Voyager Interiors company nor Sielaff Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Voyager Interiors company nor Sielaff Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sielaff Corporation company nor Voyager Interiors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sielaff Corporation company nor Voyager Interiors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sielaff Corporation company employs more people globally than Voyager Interiors company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sielaff Corporation nor Voyager Interiors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.