Comparison Overview

Sidco Labeling Systems

VS

Polyprint

Sidco Labeling Systems

1043 Di Giulio Avenue, Santa Clara, CA, 95050, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Located in the Silicon Valley, Sidco Labeling Systems is a provider of labeling and bar coding solutions. For more than 25 years we have been servicing and supplying printed labels and related equipment to a wide spectrum of industries from high tech electronics manufacturers to food producers and everything in between. The Sidco team also plays an important role for several dozen medical device and biotech companies throughout the US and globally. Most label companies can provide labels and nothing more. Sidco also provides the labeling and bar coding equipment so you can effectively utilize your labels to their full potential. More importantly you can tap into the Sidco team's decades of knowledge and experience to benefit your company.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Polyprint

Monastiriou 301, Thessaloniki, Greece, 54628, GR
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Polyprint specializes in Direct-To-Garment printing technology. We help garment decorators in the Fashion, Promotional & Custom-Made Apparel industry to start a business and grow successfully with cost-efficient solutions and great customer support. We have been designing, developing and manufacturing DTG printers with the brand name TexJet® since 2006. Based in Greece with a subsidiary (Polyprint USA) in Charlotte, North Carolina, and a global network of official distributors, we serve customers in 50+ countries, delivering TexJet® DTG printers, pretreatment machines, inks, consumables, and accessories worldwide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidco-labeling-systems.jpeg
Sidco Labeling Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyprintdtg.jpeg
Polyprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sidco Labeling Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Polyprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sidco Labeling Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Polyprint in 2025.

Incident History — Sidco Labeling Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sidco Labeling Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Polyprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Polyprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidco-labeling-systems.jpeg
Sidco Labeling Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/polyprintdtg.jpeg
Polyprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sidco Labeling Systems company and Polyprint company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Polyprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sidco Labeling Systems company.

In the current year, Polyprint company and Sidco Labeling Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Polyprint company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Polyprint company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Polyprint company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems company nor Polyprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems company nor Polyprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Polyprint company employs more people globally than Sidco Labeling Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Polyprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N