Comparison Overview

Sidco Labeling Systems

VS

Jaguar Graphics

Sidco Labeling Systems

1043 Di Giulio Avenue, Santa Clara, CA, 95050, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sidcolabeling.com

Located in the Silicon Valley, Sidco Labeling Systems is a provider of labeling and bar coding solutions. For more than 25 years we have been servicing and supplying printed labels and related equipment to a wide spectrum of industries from high tech electronics manufacturers to food producers and everything in between. The Sidco team also plays an important role for several dozen medical device and biotech companies throughout the US and globally. Most label companies can provide labels and nothing more. Sidco also provides the labeling and bar coding equipment so you can effectively utilize your labels to their full potential. More importantly you can tap into the Sidco team's decades of knowledge and experience to benefit your company.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Jaguar Graphics

3 Southside Rd, Danvers, Ma, 01923, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://jaguarprint.com/

JAGUAR Graphics is a full-service visual solutions company with a history of serving businesses in the Boston area for 25 years. Our state-of-the-art digital equipment enables us to produce full-color, custom products delivered fast, including same-day service if needed, and offer free local delivery using our own vans and drivers. You can count on us to be a reliable one-stop resource for quality business printing, mailing, large format, vehicle graphics, promotional items, and apparel. Our team of dedicated customer service and design specialists is here to assist with all your projects. JAGUAR is committed to helping you create a corporate image that will enhance your brand and increase customer confidence.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidco-labeling-systems.jpeg
Sidco Labeling Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-graphics.jpeg
Jaguar Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sidco Labeling Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jaguar Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sidco Labeling Systems in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jaguar Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Sidco Labeling Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sidco Labeling Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jaguar Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jaguar Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sidco-labeling-systems.jpeg
Sidco Labeling Systems
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-graphics.jpeg
Jaguar Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sidco Labeling Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jaguar Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jaguar Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sidco Labeling Systems company.

In the current year, Jaguar Graphics company and Sidco Labeling Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jaguar Graphics company nor Sidco Labeling Systems company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems company nor Jaguar Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems company nor Jaguar Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jaguar Graphics company employs more people globally than Sidco Labeling Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sidco Labeling Systems nor Jaguar Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References