Comparison Overview

Sicredi

VS

Merrill Lynch

Sicredi

Av. Assis Brasil, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91010-003, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

We are born collaborative We believe that change is only possible when everyone works together for the same purpose, after all, cooperativism is in our DNA. Besides this, we know that as important as it is to provide affordable financial solutions it is just as important to value growing together, quality of life and the social and economic development of everyone who makes this happen. Therefore, we are committed to our employees, our associates and the regions in which we operate. Together we make a difference We were fortunate to be recognized as one of the best companies in Brazil to work for. This recognition is a reflection of all the collective effort put into creating and maintaining a safe and welcoming work environment. Here numbers are not the most important thing, what really matters is that we are made up of people for people. We have opportunities for professionals from different areas and we recognize that working together makes a difference in our lives. Be part of this history, be Sicredi!

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Merrill Lynch

2 World Financial Center, New York, NY, 10281, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1914, Merrill is one of the largest wealth management businesses in the world. Merrill financial advisors combine financial knowledge and experience with a deep understanding of their clients’ needs to help their clients pursue the lives they want. With a deep commitment to placing their clients' interests first, Merrill financial advisors draw upon the investment insights of Merrill and the banking insights of Bank of America to unlock opportunities tailored to their clients’ needs in many areas of their financial lives. The strategies our financial advisors offer go beyond investment management to include college savings strategies, retirement planning, eldercare, philanthropy, estate planning services, small business services, and access to cash management & banking strategies. Any opinions, views, statements, estimates or projections ("posts") posted on this web page are solely those of the author(s). Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management is part of Bank of America Corporation's Global Wealth & Investment Management business. Additional Terms, Conditions & Disclaimers found here: https://www.ml.com/social-media/merrill-lynch-on-twitter.html Disclaimer The site is maintained by a third party that has no affiliation with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("MLPF&S" or "Merrill"). The recommendations posted to this page by or about Merrill employees, are not endorsed by, and may not represent the views. This material is not intended to constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security financial instrument. or strategy. Always consult with your independent attorney, tax advisor, investment managers, and insurance agent for final recommendations and before changing or implementing any financial, tax, or estate planning strategy. Bank of America Linkedin Community Guidelines: http://about.bankofamerica.com/en-us/social-media/linkedin-community­guidelines.html

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 34,776
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/merrilllynch.jpeg
Merrill Lynch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sicredi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Merrill Lynch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sicredi in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Merrill Lynch in 2025.

Incident History — Sicredi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sicredi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Merrill Lynch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Merrill Lynch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/merrilllynch.jpeg
Merrill Lynch
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error (Email Misconfiguration)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sicredi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Merrill Lynch company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Merrill Lynch company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sicredi company has not reported any.

In the current year, Merrill Lynch company has reported more cyber incidents than Sicredi company.

Neither Merrill Lynch company nor Sicredi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Merrill Lynch company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sicredi company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Merrill Lynch company nor Sicredi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sicredi company nor Merrill Lynch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Merrill Lynch company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sicredi company.

Merrill Lynch company employs more people globally than Sicredi company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sicredi nor Merrill Lynch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H