Comparison Overview

SickKids Foundation

VS

Philanthropy Works

SickKids Foundation

525 University Avenue, Suite 835, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 2L3
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Established in 1972, SickKids Foundation raises funds on behalf of The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. SickKids is leading the way in Precision Child Health (PCH). PCH is the future—it’s the end of one-size-fits-all medicine and a shift to medicine tailored precisely to each individual child. It means looking at everything that makes a patient unique, from their genetic code to their postal code, then harnessing all the science, technology and data SickKids is capable of to diagnose faster, treat smarter, and predict better. SickKids has always believed that healthier children make a better world. Precision Child Health is how we get there. Heal the future. Join us today. Our commitment to you: Staff and volunteers experience an engaging culture built on mutual respect, collaboration and a drive for excellence. We welcome and embrace individuals from diverse backgrounds, experiences and cultures. SickKids Foundation is committed to fostering an inclusive, accessible environment, where all individuals feel valued, respected and supported. Candidates requiring accommodation during the recruitment process are asked to please contact the Human Resources Department.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 590
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Philanthropy Works

None
Last Update: 2025-12-19

Philanthropy Works offers guidance and resources to help you find, engage, and retain significant donors. From establishing initial connections to building lasting relationships, we help nonprofits go beyond cash to strategic gifts that expand the horizons of institution and benefactor. The combination of proven resources—like the Gift Planning Field Guide—and fresh insight from top experts will help you improve your skills, secure critical major and planned gifts, and provide your donors with a more rewarding experience.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sickkids-foundation.jpeg
SickKids Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philanthropy-works.jpeg
Philanthropy Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SickKids Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Philanthropy Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SickKids Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Philanthropy Works in 2025.

Incident History — SickKids Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SickKids Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Philanthropy Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Philanthropy Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sickkids-foundation.jpeg
SickKids Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/philanthropy-works.jpeg
Philanthropy Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SickKids Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Philanthropy Works company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Philanthropy Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SickKids Foundation company.

In the current year, Philanthropy Works company and SickKids Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Philanthropy Works company nor SickKids Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Philanthropy Works company nor SickKids Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Philanthropy Works company nor SickKids Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SickKids Foundation company nor Philanthropy Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SickKids Foundation company nor Philanthropy Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SickKids Foundation company employs more people globally than Philanthropy Works company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SickKids Foundation nor Philanthropy Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N