Comparison Overview

SIA Group

VS

Indra

SIA Group

Avenida de Bruselas, 35, Alcobendas, Community of Madrid, ES, 28108
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

SIA is the leading cybersecurity company in Spain and Portugal, both in terms of turnover and expert talent, with more than 1,600 specialists. Its value proposition is based on the specific responses it offers organizations to meet the challenges and threats posed by the four forces of digitalization: regulatory pressure, connected infrastructures, the transformation of IT architectures and the growing digital interaction of people; responses articulated through a set of specific measures and plans to minimize risk and maximize the protection of their businesses. As a member of the Indra Group, one of the leading global technology and consultancy companies with business operations in more than 140 countries, SIA benefits from in-depth knowledge of the sector as well as a solid worldwide presence. More information at: www.sia.es

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 550
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Alcobendas, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28108
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Indra (www.indracompany.com) is one of the leading global defence, aerospace and technology companies, and a world leader in digital transformation and information technologies in Spain and Latin America through its subsidiary, Minsait. Its business model is based on a comprehensive range of proprietary products, with high-value approach and a significant innovative component, making it the technological partner for the digitalization and key operations of its clients around the world. Sustainability forms part of its strategy and culture in order to overcome current-day and future social and environmental challenges. In the 2023 fiscal year, Indra achieved revenue totaling €4.343 billion, with more than 57,000 employees, a local presence in 46 countries and business operations in over 140 countries.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 38,194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sia-group.jpeg
SIA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SIA Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SIA Group in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indra in 2025.

Incident History — SIA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SIA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sia-group.jpeg
SIA Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indra.jpeg
Indra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SIA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SIA Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Indra company has not reported any.

In the current year, Indra company and SIA Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indra company nor SIA Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indra company nor SIA Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

SIA Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Indra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SIA Group company nor Indra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SIA Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Indra company.

Indra company employs more people globally than SIA Group company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SIA Group nor Indra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X