Comparison Overview

Shutterfly

VS

Acosta

Shutterfly

10 Almaden Blvd, Suite 900, San Jose, CA, US, 95113
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Shutterfly is the leading digital retailer and manufacturer of high-quality personalized products and services. Our guiding vision is to make life's experiences unforgettable! We want to help people express themselves through personalized goods and custom-designed products, and enable them to capture moments that reflect their unique identity. Shutterfly also operates Shutterfly Business Solutions, which delivers premium digital printing services to the enterprise market; Spoonflower, a platform to create or shop for unique designs for fabric, wallpaper, and home decor; and Lifetouch, the leader in school photography and operator of portrait studios. Learn more about Life@Shutterfly and our current career opportunities by visiting https://shutterflycareers.ttcportals.com/

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 8,629
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Acosta

6600 Corporate Center Parkway, Jacksonville, FL, 32216, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Acosta brings simplicity to retail sales. We act as a catalyst to boldly connect brands, retailers and consumers, fueling growth and building long-term value throughout North America and Europe. We are deeply embedded in every corner of the retail industry, strengthening the local, regional and national relationships between brands and retailers.​ Our team of experts uses deep industry insight, cutting-edge analytics and integrated partnerships to help our clients move ahead with confidence.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,991
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shutterfly.jpeg
Shutterfly
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acosta.jpeg
Acosta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shutterfly
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Acosta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shutterfly in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta in 2025.

Incident History — Shutterfly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shutterfly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Acosta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shutterfly.jpeg
Shutterfly
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acosta.jpeg
Acosta
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Acosta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shutterfly company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shutterfly company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Acosta company.

In the current year, Acosta company and Shutterfly company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Shutterfly company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Acosta company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Acosta company and Shutterfly company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Shutterfly company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Acosta company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Shutterfly company nor Acosta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Acosta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Shutterfly company.

Acosta company employs more people globally than Shutterfly company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shutterfly nor Acosta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N