Comparison Overview

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC

VS

DisputeSoft

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC

1411 Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC is a civil defense litigation law firm defending businesses, professionals, and insurers in high-stakes litigation. Our skilled attorneys defend clients across a broad range of industries and practice areas, including medical malpractice, construction defects, insurance defense, and governmental and professional liability. Our firm was founded in Charleston, West Virginia, where it remains headquartered. Through succession and expansion, we have grown to meet our clients’ needs. We now have additional offices in Morgantown, WV, and Winchester, VA, with a combined total of over 20 attorneys who can serve clients in West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, and New York. Our lawyers have an exceptional reputation built upon providing tailored representation for each client. Our “client-first” attitude means that every member of the firm is enthusiastic and dedicated to serving our clients in an effective, efficient, and prompt manner. Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC functions as a nationally ranked law firm through the collaborative effort of our attorneys and staff. Because of our varied backgrounds and levels of expertise in particular practice areas, our attorneys work together to provide insight into cases from differing perspectives. We like to attribute this positive and innovative work style to our founding members as well as our six current owners, William R. Slicer, Dwayne E. Cyrus, Lou Ann S. Cyrus, Karen T. McElhinny, Brian J. Warner, and Natalie C. Schaefer. We are proud that half of our firm’s owners are female. For years, our firm and attorneys have had the honor of being recognized by Martindale-Hubbell®, Best Lawyers®, U.S. News and World Report, and Best’s Recommended Insurance Attorneys by AM Best, which are some of the highest recognitions in the legal profession. We have the experience and knowledge to reduce complex legal matters into simple, understandable issues.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DisputeSoft

6116 Executive Boulevard, North Bethesda, Maryland, 20852, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

DisputeSoft provides expert witness services to law firms engaged in cutting-edge, high-profile software disputes. Our 20+ experts apply scientific, technical, and specialized knowledge gained from decades of real-world experience to assist a wide variety of clients, including Fortune 100 companies and government clients engaged in various high-stakes contracts, fraud, and intellectual property disputes. Our analysis typically leads to expert opinions and an expert report, which we are prepared to defend in deposition or at trial, with compelling and persuasive expert testimony. DisputeSoft employees enjoy a relaxed and inclusive office culture that allows for flexible hours and provides opportunities for lifelong learning. Few workplaces can offer the chance to be exposed to so many parts of the software development industry – whether you are interested in data analysis, IT project failure, trade secrets, software project failure, or intellectual property rights, you’ll have the chance to learn more about these and more at DisputeSoft. To learn more about DisputeSoft, please visit our website at www.disputesoft.com. In addition, if you’re interested in a position with our firm, please visit our Careers page at www.disputesoft.com/careers.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shuman-mccuskey-&-slicer-pllc.jpeg
Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disputesoft.jpeg
DisputeSoft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DisputeSoft
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DisputeSoft in 2025.

Incident History — Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DisputeSoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DisputeSoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shuman-mccuskey-&-slicer-pllc.jpeg
Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disputesoft.jpeg
DisputeSoft
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DisputeSoft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DisputeSoft company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company.

In the current year, DisputeSoft company and Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DisputeSoft company nor Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DisputeSoft company nor Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DisputeSoft company nor Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company nor DisputeSoft company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company nor DisputeSoft company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC company employs more people globally than DisputeSoft company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shuman McCuskey Slicer PLLC nor DisputeSoft holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X