Comparison Overview

Shout For Good

VS

Women Helping Women

Shout For Good

833 Collins St, Docklands, Victoria, 3008, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Shout is a company founded by people who want to change the world by integrating new trends in technology with the potential for people to give to great causes as part of their everyday life. Shout’s commitment to innovation enables its not for profit partners to connect with a new generation of donors through mobile and online technology. Shout is reinventing the way people give to their favourite causes.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Women Helping Women

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Women Helping Women is a membership group comprised of socially conscious women in the DC metro area. Their goal is to plan and implement fundraising events to benefit projects that will impact the global community. By partnering with Citizen Effect, a nonprofit which empowers citizens to be philanthropists, Women Helping Women has a strong guarantee that the projects they fund are reputable and stable.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shout-for-good.jpeg
Shout For Good
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/women-helping-women.jpeg
Women Helping Women
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shout For Good
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Women Helping Women
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shout For Good in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Women Helping Women in 2025.

Incident History — Shout For Good (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shout For Good cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Women Helping Women (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Women Helping Women cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shout-for-good.jpeg
Shout For Good
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/women-helping-women.jpeg
Women Helping Women
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Women Helping Women company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shout For Good company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Women Helping Women company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shout For Good company.

In the current year, Women Helping Women company and Shout For Good company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Women Helping Women company nor Shout For Good company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Women Helping Women company nor Shout For Good company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Women Helping Women company nor Shout For Good company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shout For Good company nor Women Helping Women company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shout For Good company nor Women Helping Women company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Women Helping Women company employs more people globally than Shout For Good company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shout For Good nor Women Helping Women holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N