Comparison Overview

ShopRite

VS

Aramark Chile

ShopRite

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

A registered trademark of retailer-owned cooperative Wakefern Food Corp., ShopRite serves more than 6 million customers via more than 250 ShopRite locations throughout NJ, NY, PA, CT, DE & MD

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 21,536
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Aramark Chile

Av. Del Cóndor 760, Ciudad Empresarial, Huechuraba. Santiago, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Logramos un fuerte impacto en los lugares donde las personas trabajan, estudian y se recuperan. Nos concentramos en enriquecer la vida de millones de personas en todo el mundo, ofreciendo una amplia gama de servicios (en los rubros de servicios de alimentación y gestión de instalaciones) a un diverso grupo de clientes en 19 países. Prestamos nuestros servicios a mineras, empresas, proveedores de atención médica de primera línea e instituciones educativas reconocidas mundialmente. Además, todos los días soñamos nuevas maneras de hacer mejor las cosas, a través de nuestro compromiso con la innovación y nuestra pasión por la excelencia en el servicio al cliente. Innovar y diferenciarnos por entregar estos servicios con la más alta calidad y en respuesta a las cambiantes necesidades de nuestros clientes, es lo que motiva a diario al equipo comprometido de trabajadores Aramark. Unidos por la pasión por el servicio y motivados por el liderazgo de profesionales con vasta trayectoria, los más de 270.000 empleados crean experiencias que enriquecen y nutren la vida de millones de personas.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shop-rite.jpeg
ShopRite
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramark-chile.jpeg
Aramark Chile
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ShopRite
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aramark Chile
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShopRite in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aramark Chile in 2025.

Incident History — ShopRite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShopRite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aramark Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aramark Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shop-rite.jpeg
ShopRite
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramark-chile.jpeg
Aramark Chile
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aramark Chile company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ShopRite company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ShopRite company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aramark Chile company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aramark Chile company and ShopRite company have not reported any cyber incidents.

ShopRite company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Aramark Chile company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aramark Chile company nor ShopRite company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aramark Chile company nor ShopRite company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ShopRite company nor Aramark Chile company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ShopRite company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aramark Chile company.

ShopRite company employs more people globally than Aramark Chile company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ShopRite nor Aramark Chile holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H