Comparison Overview

Shirtworks

VS

Bacompt

Shirtworks

Ashville Way, Oxford, OX4 6TU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.shirtworks.co.uk

Shirtworks are a t-shirt printing specialist proud to deliver a fast and affordable screenprinting and embroidery service for personalised clothing. Our range is by no means limited to T-Shirts and we print onto just about any type of garment. We have extensive experience in the industry and been established over 30 years. We are A living wage employer and Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) printer and embroidery certified

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bacompt

8275 Allison Pointe Trail, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bacompt.com

As a leader in data-driven, full-color, and high-volume digital print and fulfillment services, Bacompt strives to exceed your expectations. How? Personal consultation and service. Creative solutions. State-of-the-art digital technology. Lightning-fast turnarounds. Unparalleled logistics expertise. And rigorous security compliance. High-security Document Processing From billing and tax statements to HIPAA-regulated letters and forms, we rigorously maintain the security of personal information. In fact, we’re contracted by the U.S. government to process high-security documents from start to finish, and we are HIPAA, FISMA, and GLBA certified. From the time we receive your data to when it goes into the mail stream, your information is processed only by employees who have passed strict background checks and security protocols. We even have an onsite USPS employee for mail validation and acceptance.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shirtworks-ltd.jpeg
Shirtworks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bacompt-systems-inc-.jpeg
Bacompt
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shirtworks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bacompt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shirtworks in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bacompt in 2025.

Incident History — Shirtworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shirtworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bacompt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bacompt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shirtworks-ltd.jpeg
Shirtworks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bacompt-systems-inc-.jpeg
Bacompt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bacompt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shirtworks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bacompt company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shirtworks company.

In the current year, Bacompt company and Shirtworks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bacompt company nor Shirtworks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bacompt company nor Shirtworks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bacompt company nor Shirtworks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shirtworks company nor Bacompt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shirtworks company nor Bacompt company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bacompt company employs more people globally than Shirtworks company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shirtworks nor Bacompt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References