Comparison Overview

Shilo

VS

Forastero

Shilo

undefined, New York, NY, 10013, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

Shilo is an Emmy Award-winning creative production company representing a group of filmmakers led by director Jose Gomez. Internationally known for creating original and commissioned work that is powerful, provocative and visually extraordinary, Shilo's deeply held passions for design-infused storytelling and innovative application of live-action, design, and animation techniques deliver breakthrough experiences for screens large and small. From its studio in New York, where recent projects have spanned short films, commercials and music videos, Shilo has the capacity and experience to originate ideas and handle all aspects of production.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forastero

Providencia, Santiago, RM, CL
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

FORASTERO LTDA was created in 2009 as a film production company to make “La Nana” (“The Maid”), winner of the “World Cinema Grand Jury Prize Dramatic” in Sundance 2009 and nominated in the Golden Globe Awards for Best Foreign Film. The film has also received the Golden Satellite Award for Best Foreign Film, a Gotham Award (Breakthrough Performance - Catalina Saavedra), and over thirty awards in several international festivals. The company seeks to continue developing films of high artistic quality, through the exploration of new mechanisms for public and private funding, and by establishing strong co-production relationships within Chile and abroad.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shilo-tv.jpeg
Shilo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forastero-ltda.jpeg
Forastero
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shilo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forastero
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shilo in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forastero in 2025.

Incident History — Shilo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shilo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forastero (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forastero cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shilo-tv.jpeg
Shilo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forastero-ltda.jpeg
Forastero
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Forastero company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shilo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Forastero company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shilo company.

In the current year, Forastero company and Shilo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forastero company nor Shilo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forastero company nor Shilo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Forastero company nor Shilo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shilo company nor Forastero company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shilo company nor Forastero company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shilo company employs more people globally than Forastero company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shilo nor Forastero holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N