Comparison Overview

Shift Collab

VS

Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center

Shift Collab

545 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 1M1, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Shift Collab is one of Canada’s leading virtual therapy practices, offering counselling and custom therapy matching across the country. We founded Shift Collab in 2016 out of a desire to modernize the therapy experience, making it more human and more accessible. We are bootstrapped, female-founded and clinician-owned with a curated team of over 125 Registered Social Workers and Registered Psychotherapists helping Canadians navigate all of life’s challenges.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center

1680 Meridian Ave, Miami Beach, Florida, 33139, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

The Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center provides comprehensive mental health services to people living in the Greater Miami Beach area. The Center was established in 1979 as a federally funded CMHC private non-profit State of Florida Corporation. The Center is accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) and the National Council for Behavioral Health Care Organization. It is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of 21 volunteers living in the Center’s service area who are vested in the Center’s client’s success. The Board provides overall policy direction for the Center operations.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiftcollab.jpeg
Shift Collab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/douglas-gardens-mental-health.jpeg
Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shift Collab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shift Collab in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center in 2026.

Incident History — Shift Collab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shift Collab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiftcollab.jpeg
Shift Collab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/douglas-gardens-mental-health.jpeg
Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shift Collab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shift Collab company.

In the current year, Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company and Shift Collab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company nor Shift Collab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company nor Shift Collab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company nor Shift Collab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shift Collab company nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shift Collab company nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shift Collab company employs more people globally than Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shift Collab nor Douglas Gardens Community Mental Health Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N