Comparison Overview

Shiba Token

VS

Discover

Shiba Token

None, None, New York , None, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://shibatoken.com/

SHIB aims at building the world’s first Dex Fund: transforming the way how staking and investment are done, with 100% auditable code and, eventually, automated multi-strategy selection for maximum yield at minimum risk. We are the first community that supports their investors by giving them a tool to grow their personal assets. Our cryptocurrency movement has been growing on multiple platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, Telegram and Discord. Our team consists of many experts in both the blockchain technology and digital business development fields. Our primary goal is to provide YOU with solutions to all the kinds of transactions you can make in the crypto space. We are working diligently to create the best experience in instantaneous transactions for our community. The diverse Shib team is working everyday on the different aspects required to ensure we meet our goals and provide our community a project they can be proud of.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Discover

2500 Lake Cook Road, Riverwoods, IL, US, 60015
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.discover.com

Discover® is now part of Capital One. Together, we’ll continue to deliver exceptional financial products and experiences, drive innovation, and serve customers. Find the latest updates at https://capitalonediscover.com. Discover is one of the most recognized brands in the U.S. with the Discover® card, America's cash rewards pioneer, and offers personal loans, home loans, checking and savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The Discover Global Network® is comprised of Discover Network, with millions of merchants and cash access locations; PULSE®, one of the nation's leading ATM/debit networks; and Diners Club International®, a global payments network with acceptance around the world.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 20,046
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiba-token.jpeg
Shiba Token
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discover.jpeg
Discover
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shiba Token
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Discover
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shiba Token in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discover in 2026.

Incident History — Shiba Token (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shiba Token cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Discover (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discover cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiba-token.jpeg
Shiba Token
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: compromised validator signing keys, flash loan manipulation, fake state signing
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discover.jpeg
Discover
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Discover company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shiba Token company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shiba Token company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Discover company has not reported any.

In the current year, Discover company and Shiba Token company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Discover company nor Shiba Token company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Shiba Token company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Discover company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Discover company nor Shiba Token company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shiba Token company nor Discover company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shiba Token company nor Discover company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Discover company employs more people globally than Shiba Token company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Discover holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References