Comparison Overview

Shiba Token

VS

Barclays

Shiba Token

None, None, New York , None, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 600 and 649

SHIB aims at building the world’s first Dex Fund: transforming the way how staking and investment are done, with 100% auditable code and, eventually, automated multi-strategy selection for maximum yield at minimum risk. We are the first community that supports their investors by giving them a tool to grow their personal assets. Our cryptocurrency movement has been growing on multiple platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, Telegram and Discord. Our team consists of many experts in both the blockchain technology and digital business development fields. Our primary goal is to provide YOU with solutions to all the kinds of transactions you can make in the crypto space. We are working diligently to create the best experience in instantaneous transactions for our community. The diverse Shib team is working everyday on the different aspects required to ensure we meet our goals and provide our community a project they can be proud of.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Barclays

1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5HP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Barclays is a British universal bank. Our vision is to be the UK-centred leader in global finance. We are a diversified bank with comprehensive UK consumer, corporate and wealth and private banking franchises, a leading investment bank and a strong, specialist US consumer bank. Through these five divisions, we are working together for a better financial future for our customers, clients and communities. With over 325 years of history and expertise in banking, Barclays operates in over 40 countries and employs approximately 83,500 people. Barclays moves, lends, invests and protects money for customers and clients worldwide. Barclays is a trading name of Barclays Bank PLC and its subsidiaries. Barclays Bank PLC is registered in England and is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1026167. Registered office: 1 Churchill Place, London E14 5HP.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 80,268
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiba-token.jpeg
Shiba Token
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shiba Token
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barclays
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shiba Token in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays in 2026.

Incident History — Shiba Token (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shiba Token cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barclays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shiba-token.jpeg
Shiba Token
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: compromised validator signing keys, flash loan manipulation, fake state signing
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-bank.jpeg
Barclays
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barclays company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shiba Token company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shiba Token company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Barclays company has not reported any.

In the current year, Barclays company and Shiba Token company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barclays company nor Shiba Token company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Shiba Token company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Barclays company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Barclays company nor Shiba Token company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shiba Token company nor Barclays company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Barclays company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Shiba Token company.

Barclays company employs more people globally than Shiba Token company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shiba Token nor Barclays holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.