Comparison Overview

LexisNexis® Sheshunoff®

VS

Edible Columbus

LexisNexis® Sheshunoff®

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Serving the needs of financial institution professionals for more than 30 years, Sheshunoff | Pratt is the most trusted provider of regulatory compliance insight, information, and analysis for financial services and banking law professionals available. Combining the expertise of acclaimed bank and credit union authors and unparalleled legal analysis from one of the nation’s oldest and most trusted providers, Sheshunoff | Pratt delivers operations and management compliance work solutions for every level of your organization.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edible Columbus

ediblecommunities.com, see ediblecommunities.com for complete list, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Edible Columbus celebrates Central Ohio food culture, season by season. We believe that knowing where our food comes from is powerful. Columbus is fortunate to have amazing people in our community dedicating themseleves to their craft, their land and their animals. Lucky for us, we get to taste the fruits of their labor. We hope to inspire our readers to shop at local markets, dine at local independent restaurants, meet the farmers and producers at your local farmers market, and truly think about what it means to our health, our community and future of our kids to support our own local food system.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheshunoff-information-services.jpeg
LexisNexis® Sheshunoff®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edible-columbus.jpeg
Edible Columbus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LexisNexis® Sheshunoff®
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edible Columbus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edible Columbus in 2025.

Incident History — LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edible Columbus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edible Columbus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheshunoff-information-services.jpeg
LexisNexis® Sheshunoff®
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edible-columbus.jpeg
Edible Columbus
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Edible Columbus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edible Columbus company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company.

In the current year, Edible Columbus company and LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edible Columbus company nor LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edible Columbus company nor LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edible Columbus company nor LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company nor Edible Columbus company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company nor Edible Columbus company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® company employs more people globally than Edible Columbus company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LexisNexis® Sheshunoff® nor Edible Columbus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.