Comparison Overview

Sherwood Electromotion Inc.

VS

Racine Railroad Products

Sherwood Electromotion Inc.

20 Barnes Court, Concord, L4K 4L4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. (SEI) is a leading independent provider of assembly, overhaul and manufacturing services for propulsion systems equipment and electrical rotating apparatus for Rail, Mass Transit and Wind Industries. SEI is a family owned and operated company that has been in business for over 40 years. As a company we are committed to providing our clients with outstanding quality, integrity and, value.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Racine Railroad Products

1955 Norwood Ct., Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, 53403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Racine Railroad Products is a railroad manufacturing company located in Mount Pleasant, WI. We specialize in Maintenance-of-Way equipment. We have been designing, manufacturing and servicing quality Maintenance-of-Way equipment for the railroad industry since 1970. Commitment to our customers is our top priority. This means designing and manufacturing equipment with a heavy emphasis on safety, performance and reliability.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwoodelectromotion.jpeg
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racine-railroad-products.jpeg
Racine Railroad Products
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Racine Railroad Products
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sherwood Electromotion Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Racine Railroad Products in 2025.

Incident History — Sherwood Electromotion Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Racine Railroad Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Racine Railroad Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwoodelectromotion.jpeg
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racine-railroad-products.jpeg
Racine Railroad Products
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company and Racine Railroad Products company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Racine Railroad Products company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company.

In the current year, Racine Railroad Products company and Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Racine Railroad Products company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Racine Railroad Products company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Racine Railroad Products company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company nor Racine Railroad Products company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company nor Racine Railroad Products company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company employs more people globally than Racine Railroad Products company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Racine Railroad Products holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H