Comparison Overview

Sherwood Electromotion Inc.

VS

Loram Australia

Sherwood Electromotion Inc.

20 Barnes Court, Concord, L4K 4L4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. (SEI) is a leading independent provider of assembly, overhaul and manufacturing services for propulsion systems equipment and electrical rotating apparatus for Rail, Mass Transit and Wind Industries. SEI is a family owned and operated company that has been in business for over 40 years. As a company we are committed to providing our clients with outstanding quality, integrity and, value.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Loram Australia

239 George St, Brisbane City, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

About Us: Loram is a global pioneer in maintenance of way technology, machinery, and services. Around the world we partner with industry to enhance the life, reliability, and quality of essential rail infrastructure. Loram is a leading supplier of track maintenance services and equipment. We provide maintenance of way services to Class I and short line railroads, transits, and commuter rails. We are one of the largest fleet of maintenance of way with 123 machines located in 16 different countries. Safety: Safety is intertwined in all of our core values. Loram is a proud recipient of the NRC Contractor of the Year award in safety. Expertise: Our strong knowledge base gets us to the root need faster, helping us deliver advanced equipment, innovative solutions, and unrivaled customer service to maintain and maximize railway infrastructure. Our Values: We integrate our Core Values into everything we do and every decision we make to ensure the safety of our workers, the purpose of our mission and a never-ending commitment to putting our customers first. Environment: Loram is proud to be LEED certified. We've also made substantial progress in addressing environmental issues unique to rail grinding starting with lower fuel consumption, fewer emissions and cleaner air. Vision: Loram will be respected globally as the leader in the railway infrastructure markets we serve. Mission: Our people deliver advanced equipment, innovative solutions, and unrivaled customer service in a safe and reliable manner to maintain and improve railway infrastructure.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwoodelectromotion.jpeg
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loram-pty.jpeg
Loram Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Loram Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sherwood Electromotion Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Loram Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Sherwood Electromotion Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Loram Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loram Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwoodelectromotion.jpeg
Sherwood Electromotion Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loram-pty.jpeg
Loram Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company and Loram Australia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Loram Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company.

In the current year, Loram Australia company and Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Loram Australia company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Loram Australia company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Loram Australia company nor Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company nor Loram Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Loram Australia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company.

Sherwood Electromotion Inc. company employs more people globally than Loram Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sherwood Electromotion Inc. nor Loram Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H