Comparison Overview

Sherwood Law Group

VS

The Perecman Firm

Sherwood Law Group

218 N. Jefferson, Suite #401, Chicago, IL, 60661, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sherwood Law Group is a highly specialized boutique law firm providing superior value, greater access to the senior-most attorneys and higher priority among the firm’s clients. As a “boutique” law firm, we are better suited to being responsive to a client’s individual needs and are committed to satisfying and educating our clients so that you may better understand the legal process and how we look to provide the best legal service in your specific case, as well as obtain the best possible outcome. With extensive experience in both litigation and transactional law, Sherwood Law Group takes pride in providing its clients with professional, personalized, and fiscally-responsible solutions to the most complex legal problems. Our attorneys and staff are always accessible to review and analyze your legal concerns and will provide timely feedback on scheduling an appointment. Regardless of the case, contact Sherwood Law Group for the best possible legal advise. We look forward to serving all your legal needs!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Perecman Firm

250 West 57th Street, New York, New York, 10107, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Perecman Firm is a boutique personal injury law firm based in New York with offices in Manhattan, Queens, and Long Island. Since founding The Perecman Firm in 1983, attorney David Perecman, along with the rest of our lawyers and staff, has helped victims of accidents and negligence in New York City recover over $750 million in trial verdicts and settlements. The Perecman Firm handles more construction accident cases yearly than many personal injury lawyers handle in their entire careers. We know how serious accidents can cause stress and emotion for clients and their families. When you need help from an attorney, talk with a law firm that has spent years working with injured New Yorkers just like you. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwood-law-group.jpeg
Sherwood Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-perecman-firm-p-l-l-c-.jpeg
The Perecman Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sherwood Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Perecman Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sherwood Law Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Perecman Firm in 2025.

Incident History — Sherwood Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sherwood Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Perecman Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Perecman Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sherwood-law-group.jpeg
Sherwood Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-perecman-firm-p-l-l-c-.jpeg
The Perecman Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Sherwood Law Group company and The Perecman Firm company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Perecman Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sherwood Law Group company.

In the current year, The Perecman Firm company and Sherwood Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Perecman Firm company nor Sherwood Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Perecman Firm company nor Sherwood Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Perecman Firm company nor Sherwood Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sherwood Law Group company nor The Perecman Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sherwood Law Group company nor The Perecman Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Perecman Firm company employs more people globally than Sherwood Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sherwood Law Group nor The Perecman Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X