Comparison Overview

Sheldon ISD

VS

Cobb County School District

Sheldon ISD

11411 C.E. King Pkwy, Houston, Texas, US, 77044
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Sheldon ISD, a PK-12th grade public school system, has a mission to maintain a safe environment where staff, parents, and community work together to engage students in personalized learning opportunities to ensure they are college and career ready.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 895
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Cobb County School District

514 Glover Street, Marietta, GA, US, 30060
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT is a public school system with administrative offices based at 514 Glover St., Marietta, GA 30060. Cobb County School District (CCSD) is the second largest school system in Georgia. CCSD is responsible for educating more than 112,000 students in a diverse, constantly changing suburban environment. CCSD is made up of 113 schools and employs over 18,000 employees, making it the largest employer in Cobb County, GA. Our mission is Creating and Supporting Pathways for Success. Our vision is One Team, One Goal: Student Success.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 10,189
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheldon-isd.jpeg
Sheldon ISD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheldon ISD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cobb County School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheldon ISD in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cobb County School District in 2025.

Incident History — Sheldon ISD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheldon ISD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cobb County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cobb County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheldon-isd.jpeg
Sheldon ISD
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cobb County School District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sheldon ISD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sheldon ISD company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cobb County School District company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cobb County School District company and Sheldon ISD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Sheldon ISD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sheldon ISD company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cobb County School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Sheldon ISD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheldon ISD company nor Cobb County School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cobb County School District company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sheldon ISD company.

Cobb County School District company employs more people globally than Sheldon ISD company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheldon ISD nor Cobb County School District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N