Comparison Overview

Sheffield Museums

VS

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)

Sheffield Museums

Arundel Gate, Sheffield, GB, S1 2PP
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museums-sheffield.org.uk/

Sheffield Museums Trust is the independent charity that operates six of the city’s leading museums and heritage sites: Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet, Graves Gallery, Kelham Island Museum, Millennium Gallery, Shepherd Wheel and Weston Park Museum. Established in 2021, the charity cares for the city’s collections of art, human and industrial history, and natural science, alongside the Guild of St George’s John Ruskin collection and is home to the Ken Hawley Collection Trust’s Hawley Tool Collection. We work with our communities to tell the remarkable story of Sheffield and its people, and celebrate its reputation for excellence in craft, making and innovation. Together with local, regional and national partners, we showcase home-grown creative talent and bring outstanding cultural experiences to the city.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)

55 Water St, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mofad.org

MOFAD is a new kind of museum that brings the world of food to life with exhibits you can taste, touch, and smell. We inspire public curiosity about food, what it means, and how it connects with the world around us. Our goal to be the world’s premier food museum and a global educational resource that inspires generations of curious eaters of all ages and backgrounds. The museum currently operates MOFAD Lab, a 5,000-square-foot experimental space in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Learn more at mofad.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-food-and-drink.jpeg
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield Museums
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield Museums in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) in 2026.

Incident History — Sheffield Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-food-and-drink.jpeg
Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sheffield Museums company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sheffield Museums company.

In the current year, Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company and Sheffield Museums company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sheffield Museums company employs more people globally than Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Museum of Food and Drink (MOFAD) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References