Comparison Overview

Sheffield Museums

VS

Minnesota Historical Society

Sheffield Museums

Arundel Gate, Sheffield, GB, S1 2PP
Last Update: 2026-01-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museums-sheffield.org.uk/

Sheffield Museums Trust is the independent charity that operates six of the city’s leading museums and heritage sites: Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet, Graves Gallery, Kelham Island Museum, Millennium Gallery, Shepherd Wheel and Weston Park Museum. Established in 2021, the charity cares for the city’s collections of art, human and industrial history, and natural science, alongside the Guild of St George’s John Ruskin collection and is home to the Ken Hawley Collection Trust’s Hawley Tool Collection. We work with our communities to tell the remarkable story of Sheffield and its people, and celebrate its reputation for excellence in craft, making and innovation. Together with local, regional and national partners, we showcase home-grown creative talent and bring outstanding cultural experiences to the city.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Minnesota Historical Society

345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mnhs.org/

The Minnesota Historical Society is a non-profit educational and cultural institution established in 1849. The Society collects, preserves and tells the story of Minnesota’s past through museum exhibits, libraries and collections, historic sites, educational programs and book publishing. Using the power of history to transform lives, the Society preserves our past, shares our state’s stories and connects people with history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 515
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-historical-society.jpeg
Minnesota Historical Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield Museums
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minnesota Historical Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield Museums in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Historical Society in 2026.

Incident History — Sheffield Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minnesota Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-historical-society.jpeg
Minnesota Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Minnesota Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sheffield Museums company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Minnesota Historical Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sheffield Museums company.

In the current year, Minnesota Historical Society company and Sheffield Museums company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minnesota Historical Society company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minnesota Historical Society company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minnesota Historical Society company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Minnesota Historical Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor Minnesota Historical Society company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Minnesota Historical Society company employs more people globally than Sheffield Museums company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield Museums nor Minnesota Historical Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References