Comparison Overview

Sheffield Theatres

VS

The Santa Fe Opera

Sheffield Theatres

55 Norfolk Street, Sheffield, undefined, S1 1DA, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

We’re the world-famous Crucible, a Sheffield landmark with a distinctive stage and a reputation for unforgettable productions. We’re the Playhouse, an intimate, versatile space for getting even closer to the action. We’re the beautiful Lyceum, the gleaming traditional proscenium arch theatre that hosts the best of the UK’s touring shows.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Santa Fe Opera

301 OPERA DR, None, SANTA FE, New Mexico, US, 87506
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

From the unlikeliest of beginnings—an opera company located hundreds of miles from any major city, featuring American singers in a wide-ranging and challenging repertory, and treating theatrical and musical values as equally important in its productions—The Santa Fe Opera has grown to become recognized as one of the world's leading cultural festivals.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 263
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-theatres.jpeg
Sheffield Theatres
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-santa-fe-opera.jpeg
The Santa Fe Opera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield Theatres
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Santa Fe Opera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield Theatres in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Santa Fe Opera in 2025.

Incident History — Sheffield Theatres (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield Theatres cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Santa Fe Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Santa Fe Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-theatres.jpeg
Sheffield Theatres
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-santa-fe-opera.jpeg
The Santa Fe Opera
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sheffield Theatres company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Santa Fe Opera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Santa Fe Opera company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sheffield Theatres company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Santa Fe Opera company and Sheffield Theatres company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Santa Fe Opera company nor Sheffield Theatres company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The Santa Fe Opera company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sheffield Theatres company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Santa Fe Opera company nor Sheffield Theatres company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield Theatres company nor The Santa Fe Opera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sheffield Theatres company nor The Santa Fe Opera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Santa Fe Opera company employs more people globally than Sheffield Theatres company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield Theatres nor The Santa Fe Opera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N