Comparison Overview

Sheffield City Council

VS

Workingfor.be

Sheffield City Council

Town Hall, Sheffield, S1 2HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-05

To spread the word about Sheffield, its people, businesses, services, products, culture, leisure, green spaces and sport. We're here to help and we expect users to offer us the same level of courtesy and respect that we offer to them. We want our social media channels to be safe spaces where we welcome comments and engagement on our posts. We want them to be a place for healthy, open, and insightful discussion which is why we have a short set of house rules which you can find at https://sheffnews.com/about-us

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,397
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30 Bld. Simon Bolivar 30 Brussels, Brabant 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choose an employer who embraces your talent and individuality and gives you the opportunity to develop yourself and your skills further every single day. Moreover, we offer you a job where you can easily find the balance between your professional and personal life. Do you want to contribute to the Belgium of tomorrow? Feel like making a difference and developing your talents? Discover our wide range of vacancies at www.workingfor.be

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/selor.jpeg
Workingfor.be
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield City Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Workingfor.be
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield City Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2025.

Incident History — Sheffield City Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield City Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Inaccuracies in Printing, Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/selor.jpeg
Workingfor.be
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sheffield City Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Workingfor.be company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sheffield City Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Workingfor.be company has not reported any.

In the current year, Workingfor.be company and Sheffield City Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Workingfor.be company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sheffield City Council company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Workingfor.be company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Workingfor.be company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council company nor Workingfor.be company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sheffield City Council company nor Workingfor.be company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Workingfor.be company employs more people globally than Sheffield City Council company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Workingfor.be holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X