Comparison Overview

Sheffield City Council

VS

Region Midtjylland

Sheffield City Council

Town Hall, Sheffield, S1 2HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-05

To spread the word about Sheffield, its people, businesses, services, products, culture, leisure, green spaces and sport. We're here to help and we expect users to offer us the same level of courtesy and respect that we offer to them. We want our social media channels to be safe spaces where we welcome comments and engagement on our posts. We want them to be a place for healthy, open, and insightful discussion which is why we have a short set of house rules which you can find at https://sheffnews.com/about-us

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,397
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Region Midtjylland

Skottenborg 26, Viborg, undefined, 8800, DK
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Region Midtjyllands mål er at skabe sundhed, trivsel, vækst og velstand for regionens 1,3 millioner borgere. Vi er cirka 30.000 kolleger, der er fælles om at sikre helhed og sammenhæng for patienter, brugere og borgere i regionen. Det gælder lige fra at tilbyde den bedste behandling her og nu til at udvikle fremtidens sundhedstilbud, være førende inden for forskning og gøre en indsats for at være en attraktiv og bæredygtig vækstregion. Læs meget mere om Region Midtjylland på www.rm.dk. Følg os også på FB og Twitter: www.twitter.com/regionmidtjylland www.facebook.com/regionmidtjylland

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,546
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/region-midtjylland.jpeg
Region Midtjylland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield City Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Region Midtjylland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield City Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Midtjylland in 2025.

Incident History — Sheffield City Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield City Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Region Midtjylland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Midtjylland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Inaccuracies in Printing, Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/region-midtjylland.jpeg
Region Midtjylland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sheffield City Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Region Midtjylland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sheffield City Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Region Midtjylland company has not reported any.

In the current year, Region Midtjylland company and Sheffield City Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Region Midtjylland company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sheffield City Council company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Region Midtjylland company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Region Midtjylland company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council company nor Region Midtjylland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Region Midtjylland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sheffield City Council company.

Region Midtjylland company employs more people globally than Sheffield City Council company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Region Midtjylland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X