Comparison Overview

Sheffield City Council

VS

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Sheffield City Council

Town Hall, Sheffield, S1 2HH, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-05

To spread the word about Sheffield, its people, businesses, services, products, culture, leisure, green spaces and sport. We're here to help and we expect users to offer us the same level of courtesy and respect that we offer to them. We want our social media channels to be safe spaces where we welcome comments and engagement on our posts. We want them to be a place for healthy, open, and insightful discussion which is why we have a short set of house rules which you can find at https://sheffnews.com/about-us

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,397
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

24 Beacon Street, None, Boston, MA, US, 02133
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Year after year, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has continued to pioneer bold legislative actions and programs, some of which have been embraced on a national scale. We are always looking for talented individuals to help us maintain this momentum and improve the services that millions of people depend on every day. If you’re looking for an innovative work environment where you can really make a difference, check out the job opportunities with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This page is managed according to the Mass.gov social media policy: https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massgov-social-media-policy. Comments that do not follow our policy may be removed.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,463
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sheffield City Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield City Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2025.

Incident History — Sheffield City Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield City Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Commonwealth of Massachusetts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth of Massachusetts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffield-city-council.jpeg
Sheffield City Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Inaccuracies in Printing, Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/commonwealth-of-massachusetts.jpeg
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sheffield City Council company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Commonwealth of Massachusetts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sheffield City Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported any.

In the current year, Commonwealth of Massachusetts company and Sheffield City Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sheffield City Council company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Commonwealth of Massachusetts company nor Sheffield City Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council company nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sheffield City Council company.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts company employs more people globally than Sheffield City Council company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sheffield City Council nor Commonwealth of Massachusetts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X