Comparison Overview

Shedd Aquarium

VS

Oceanside Museum of Art

Shedd Aquarium

1200 S. DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

At Shedd Aquarium, we spark compassion, curiosity and conservation for the aquatic animal world. As a neighborhood partner and global collaborator, we’re a vital resource in the areas of animal care, conservation research and learning, and it’s all because we have a passion for animals, their habitats and the planet we share. It takes a lot of people—with a lot of different skill sets and talents—to operate our world-class aquarium 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. That’s why we look for the “it’s–not-a-job-it’s-a-passion” type of employee. Take a look at available career, internship and volunteer opportunities on our website: https://www.sheddaquarium.org/About-Us/Jobs-Internships-and-Volunteering/

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oceanside Museum of Art

704 Pier View Way, Oceanside, 92054, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Proudly located in the heart of the Oceanside, California Cultural District, Oceanside Museum of Art (OMA) is dedicated to bringing people together to explore the art and stories of Southern California artists since 1997. Through inspiring exhibitions, award-winning education programs, and dynamic events, activities, and offerings, OMA visitors of all ages, interests, and backgrounds experience a welcoming, friendly, and inclusive hub for creativity, connection, and learning through art. A little edgy, willing to take risks, and unpretentious, OMA is a reflection of the identity of the coastal community of Oceanside along the cultural corridor between Los Angeles and San Diego. OMA showcases the best visual arts talent in the region and celebrates the inspiring and transformative power of art. For more information, visit www.oma-online.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shedd-aquarium.jpeg
Shedd Aquarium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oceanside-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oceanside Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shedd Aquarium
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oceanside Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shedd Aquarium in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oceanside Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Shedd Aquarium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shedd Aquarium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oceanside Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oceanside Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shedd-aquarium.jpeg
Shedd Aquarium
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oceanside-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oceanside Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Shedd Aquarium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oceanside Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oceanside Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shedd Aquarium company.

In the current year, Oceanside Museum of Art company and Shedd Aquarium company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art company nor Shedd Aquarium company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art company nor Shedd Aquarium company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oceanside Museum of Art company nor Shedd Aquarium company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shedd Aquarium company nor Oceanside Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shedd Aquarium company nor Oceanside Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Shedd Aquarium company employs more people globally than Oceanside Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shedd Aquarium nor Oceanside Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H