Comparison Overview

Shawmut Strategies Group

VS

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission

Shawmut Strategies Group

11 Beacon St., Suite 1125, Boston, MA, US, 02108
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

At Shawmut Strategies Group, we make government more accessible so our clients can thrive. At its core, the work we do is about helping people better understand each other. We deliver for our clients by strategically bridging the communications gap among stakeholders, putting our political, policy, and process expertise to work.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission

444 N Capitol St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) was created by the United States Congress on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for 2001 (codified at 22 U.S.C. §7002) with the legislative mandate to monitor, investigate, and submit to Congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. In accordance with its mandate, the Commission focuses its work and study on the following eleven areas: proliferation practices, economic transfers, energy and natural resources, foreign investment, military and security affairs, cyber activities, economic conditions, foreign affairs, compliance and enforcement, freedom of information, and product safety. The Commission has 12 members, three of whom are appointed by each of the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House. The Commissioners serve two-year terms. The Commissioners are supported by policy and administrative staff with extensive backgrounds in trade, economics, national security, foreign policy, and U.S.-China relations.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-strategies.jpeg
Shawmut Strategies Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u.s.-china-economic-and-security-review-commission.jpeg
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shawmut Strategies Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shawmut Strategies Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Shawmut Strategies Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shawmut Strategies Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-strategies.jpeg
Shawmut Strategies Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u.s.-china-economic-and-security-review-commission.jpeg
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shawmut Strategies Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Shawmut Strategies Group company.

In the current year, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company and Shawmut Strategies Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company nor Shawmut Strategies Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company nor Shawmut Strategies Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company nor Shawmut Strategies Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group company nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group company nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission company employs more people globally than Shawmut Strategies Group company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shawmut Strategies Group nor U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L