Comparison Overview

Shawmut Communications Group

VS

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

Shawmut Communications Group

310 Jubilee Dr, Peabody, Massachusetts, 01960, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shawmutdelivers.com

Shawmut Communications Group is where creativity unfolds. As the first SGP-certified printer in Massachusetts, we’re committed to working collaboratively with other printers, print buyers, suppliers, and supporting organizations to drive sustainable business practices. Founded in 1951—and now in our 3rd generation of family ownership—the Shawmut team has decades of experience. Every member of our team is committed to helping our clients achieve their goals—because when they succeed, we succeed. Visit www.ShawmutDelivers.com or call 978-762-7500 to learn more.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

11610 S Alden St, Olathe, 66062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phenixlabel.com

Phenix Label is a 5th generation family-owned label and packaging partner delivering innovative solutions that help brands stand out and scale. For 130 years, we’ve helped food & beverage, personal care, pharmaceutical, household, and automotive brands bring their products to market with precision, speed, and impact. From labels and flexible packaging to RFID smart labeling, our team makes packaging one less thing you have to worry about. What sets us apart? Dedicated customer teams, in-house R&D, sustainability leadership, and unmatched service that simplifies your packaging process while supporting your bottom line. Phenix Label — Better Service. Bottom Line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-communications-group.jpeg
Shawmut Communications Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Shawmut Communications Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shawmut Communications Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phenix Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Shawmut Communications Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shawmut Communications Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phenix Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phenix Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shawmut-communications-group.jpeg
Shawmut Communications Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Shawmut Communications Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Shawmut Communications Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Phenix Label Company, Inc. company and Shawmut Communications Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Shawmut Communications Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Shawmut Communications Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Shawmut Communications Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Shawmut Communications Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Shawmut Communications Group nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References